Decline of the Mauryan Empire

Extent of Mauryan Empire/250 BCE

Here is an overview of the reasons for the decline of the Maurya Empire. These points can be further explored and expanded for a comprehensive understanding.

1. Brahmanical Reaction:

  • Ashoka's anti-sacrifice stance and promotion of Buddhism resulted in loss for the Brahmanas who relied on sacrificial offerings.
  • Brahmanas developed antipathy towards Ashoka and desired a policy favoring their interests and privileges.
  • Brahmana dynasties like the Sungas, Kanvas, and Satavahanas emerged and performed Vedic sacrifices abandoned by Ashoka.

2. Financial Crisis:

  • Maintaining a large army and paying bureaucrats led to immense expenditure and financial strain on the empire.
  • Despite imposing taxes, the Mauryas struggled to sustain their massive administrative structure.
  • Ashoka's grants to Buddhist monks depleted the royal treasury, necessitating the melting of gold images.
  • Establishing settlements on newly cleared lands further strained the treasury due to initial tax exemptions.

3. Oppressive Rule:

  • Misrule and oppression in the provinces caused dissatisfaction among the citizens.
  • Ashoka attempted to address these grievances, but oppression persisted.
  • Taxila, a city that had previously complained under Bindusara's rule, rebelled once again after Ashoka's retirement, leading to the loss of imperial control.

4. Partition of the Empire:

  • Following Ashoka's death, the Mauryan Empire split into western and eastern parts, weakening its unity.
  • Jalauka, Ashoka's son, ruled over Kashmir independently, opening the way for invasions from the northwest.

5. Highly Centralized Administration:

  • The centralized administration of the Mauryas became problematic under later kings who were less efficient administrators.
  • Chandragupta Maurya and Ashoka effectively controlled the administration, but weaker rulers contributed to its decline.
  • The vastness of the empire required a strong ruler at the center, and the weakening administration facilitated the rise of independent kingdoms.

6. Weak Monarchs after Ashoka:

  • The successors of Ashoka were weak kings who couldn't handle the burden of the vast empire.
  • Only the first three Mauryan kings were exceptional, while later rulers lacked their predecessors' abilities and character.
  • Brihadratha, the last Maurya king, was overthrown by his army commander, Pushyamitra.

7. Independence of the Provinces:

  • After Ashoka, the center's control over the empire weakened, leading to the emergence of independent kingdoms.
  • Kashmir, Kalinga, Gandhara, and Vidarbha became independent under different rulers.

8. Spread of New Material Knowledge:

  • The dissemination of iron tools and weapons in peripheral areas reduced Magadha's advantage.
  • New kingdoms like the Shungas, Kanvas, Chetis, and Satavahans emerged based on the material culture acquired from Magadha.

9. Internal Revolt:

  • Pushyamitra Shunga, the army chief, revolted against Brihadratha's rule, resulting in the end of Mauryan rule and the rise of the Shunga dynasty.

10. Foreign Invasions:

  • During the reign of the first three Mauryan kings, foreign powers hesitated to attack due to the mighty Mauryan army.
  • However, after Ashoka's death, the divided kingdom attracted foreign invasions.
  • The Greeks, Indo-Greeks, Sakas, and Kushanas established their kingdoms on Indian soil.

11. Ashoka's Policies:

  • Some scholars argue that Ashoka's policies of non-violence and pacifism weakened the empire.
  • The cessation of wars made the kingdom vulnerable to foreign attacks, and Ashoka's focus on propagating Buddhism diverted resources.

12. Neglect of the Northwest Frontier:

  • Unlike the Great Wall of China, constructed to defend against nomadic tribes, Ashoka neglected fortifying the northwestern frontier.
  • The absence of defensive measures allowed foreign powers like the Greeks, Parthians, Shakas, and Scythians to invade India

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post